The video has been generated by ‘inVideo’ AI software. The video is referencing back to wayfinding project.
The AI text to video provided quick and effortless short, informative clip about wayfinding from LBU Rose Bowl campus to Broadcasting Tower.
The concept of the video scenario was to visualise the way from point A to B enclosed within 1 minute clip. The outcome provided by the AI software came out poor and basic in my opinion.
The lack of AI generative images and videos within the clip creates no sense of context of the article, however few images that have been assembled are connected to the concept of the scenario.
The choice of images by the AI has bun purely based on the context of the topic of the video, where the images play a role of supportive content towards audio description.
The AI text to video provides tool to direct the outcome, changing its tone, visual theme, pace and intensity of information which can be implemented and changed at any time before processing the file further towards video format.
‘inVideo’ software offers free video generator, that provides the users to freely explore the possibilities of AI software. However, more complex techniques and AI generators must be purchased in form of paid monthly or annual subscriptions.
‘Extras’ provided in paid subscriptions offer better variety of images and clips, that are generated directly by the AI software. Music will be also composed by the preferences of the user.
The use of AI within the wayfinding project, and the representation of the project within a form of a AI-created video could offer more effective way of presentation the work, with special emphasis on workload efficiency, where the video has been created within 5 minutes.
As the AI provides efficient ways of creating presentation videos, in my opinion, the way the outcome can be described is ‘soulless’ and lacks of ‘human attention’ making the video primitive.
